Colorado has, to put it mildly, a robust political non-profit ecosystem involving a complex web of donor advised funds, incubators, political startups, foundations, and service organizations. Money shuttles back and forth, with legislators doling out grants to non-profits, that in return donate to campaigns and lobby those same lawmakers for yet more. Some savvy legislators have even cut out the middleman, running non-profits that get tax dollars to do the state’s bidding.
Like any ecosystem, nonprofits in Colorado are characterized by a lot of interconnectedness. An incubator is sheltering and raising the next generation of 501(c)(3)s (the IRS designation for tax exempt status) which are already receiving grants from older, more established foundations. Grants go from the state to a fund, which then divides it up among a series of other nonprofits. As someone who has been at work watching and tracking this for a bit now, I can tell you that as much as I’ve learned, I’ve only scratched the surface.
The Rose Community Foundation (RCF) is a case in point.
Following the money
Looking through government databases such as the TOPS expense report and the Secretary of State’s TRACER contributions tracker shows that Colorado has granted or paid RCF $12.2 million taxpayer dollars since 2015, with $3.8 million in fiscal year 2025 alone. Since 2020, RCF has in turn doled out $626K in political contributions to causes ranging from abortion rights to “free” school lunches and from gay rights to higher taxes.
RCF has gotten state money for things as diverse as census outreach back in 2020 to get “hard to count” populations on the books, to more recent efforts using both state and federal money to help resettle refugees and help with legal representation to migrants flooding Colorado after crossing the southern border.
RCF has also not been shy about spreading their donors’ dough around Colorado. Their most recent Form 990 (a federal tax form that this type of nonprofit has to fill out), shows grants from the thousands up to hundreds of thousands to 469 other nonprofits and governmental organizations.
RCF ladles money onto groups like Representative Lorena Garcia’s Statewide Parent Coalition (itself a hungry consumer of tax money), Headwaters Land Trust, progressive political groups like New Era Colorado and Warm Cookies of the Revolution, left-leaning public health and gun violence prevention group Trailhead Institute, and a whole host of media organizations.
Wielding influence
It’s reasonable to argue about the wisdom of the things Colorado tasks RCF to do–whether it’s the proper role of government or a good use of tax dollars. The sheer scale involved, coupled with the vertical integration of donors, governments, and other nonprofits ought to be concerning to anyone whether they like the policy or not, however.
RCF gets money that flows from Washington DC after funneling through the state: the legislature takes federal dollars, doles them out to state agencies, said agencies then hand the money to RCF, with (finally) RCF parceling out that money to a group of subgrantees they pick. When working on a series about RCF for my Substack, I made the remark that they are almost a fourth branch of government.
There is one critical difference between RCF and the government though. Despite spending tax dollars and having a political footprint all over Colorado, you don’t get to elect anyone at RCF, their decision making and budgeting isn’t public record, and you can’t do any records requests to see what they’re up to behind closed doors.
The reality is that money equals influence, and RCF spreads its influence in all manner of ways and all over Colorado. That is one hell of a lot of taxpayer-subsidized power for one group to wield.
Cory Gaines teaches college physics and is a regular contributor to Complete Colorado. He lives in Sterling on Colorado’s Eastern Plains. He also writes at the Colorado Accountability Project substack

