DENVER–A bill imposing new restrictions on police access to vehicle location surveillance data cleared a Colorado Senate committee on Monday, with one Democrat sponsor making no bones that the legislation is in significant part aimed at federal immigration enforcement.
Senate Bill 26-070 bans law enforcement agencies from accessing databases containing historical vehicle locations without first obtaining a warrant. The bill also prohibits any sharing of data with third parties, including via Colorado Open Records Act (CORA) requests.
Such databases include those used by companies like Flock Safety, Motorola, and Axon, which utilize cameras, license plate readers, and cellular networks in public intersections to assist police in tracking vehicle movements throughout the state.
Flock cameras operate in 5,000 communities nationwide, including at least 75 in Colorado. For example, Thornton reports Flock data being involved in over 200 criminal cases, while the system led to over 300 arrests in Denver in 2025.
While law enforcement agencies currently have open access to vehicle location data, SB-070 would require police to obtain a judicial warrant requesting data for specific cases. If granted, the department cannot retain the data for longer than 31 days.
Police agencies must adopt a compliance policy promising that the information will be kept secure and only accessed upon written approval from a supervisor. Police departments would also be subject to a state audit at least every 90 days.
The policy includes a mandatory record keeping of all times data was accessed. The log would include purpose for request, written approval, information description, government official identity, proof of redaction of any personal face imaging or information, and an annual report drafted for the public.
Aimed at ICE
During the Feb. 23 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. Judy Amabile, a prime sponsor of the bill, said a primary goal is to keep Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents out of Colorado: “Information has been shared with ICE, and it is hurting people in Colorado,” Amabile said, noting that while requiring a warrant is an extra step for police, it shouldn’t be that difficult to obtain.
Amabile’s legislative aide, Robin Noble, told Complete Colorado that some of Amabile’s constituents “fears and concerns have been heightened” with regard to seeking reproductive health care as well as over ICE activity.
According to Amabile’s office, the legislation has gotten push back from several local law enforcement agencies. The Colorado Association of Chiefs of Police (CACP), County Sheriffs of Colorado, and Colorado Municipal League (CML) have also formally opposed the bill.
“Cities and towns are already on the front lines of creating reasonable guardrails around this technology, SB26-070 doesn’t build on those efforts it overrides them with rigid, statewide mandates that do not reflect how investigations work,” a CML position paper reads.
Paris Lewbel, spokesperson for Flock Safety, told Complete Colorado that Flock has been used to locate five missing children in the last four months and that the company has provided their feedback to Colorado lawmakers,
“Flock Safety strongly supports legislation that creates guardrails for how license plate recognition data is used and shared, enhances transparency, and helps build public trust – while preserving the efficacy of this important public safety tool,” Lewbel told Complete Colorado.
According to the bill’s fiscal note, SB26-070 would cost $1,989,633 in FY2026-27 and an additional $1,498,431 in FY2027-28.
Seven amendments were adopted during the committee hearing, including data access timeframes and narrower definitions.
The bill now heads to the Senate Appropriations Committee and will likely be heard in late March.

