Allen Best, at his blog Big Pivots, published recently that Colorado for the first time saw a majority of the state’s energy generation come from renewables:
Colorado achieved an energy and climate milestone during the first quarter of 2026. During those three months, 53% of electricity in Colorado came from renewable sources, up from 43% in 2025, according to an Energy Information Administration report filed in May.
Details matter
The trouble is that this jubilant announcement of a “majority” renewables power grid owes more to a stark drop in coal-fired generation than the wind and solar that was added. Percentages rely on both the numerator — how much wind, solar, and hydropower was generated — as well as the denominator, or how much total generation there was.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Electric Power Monthly net generation by state data, released June 25, demonstrates this. Renewables’ utility-scale generation rose 15.8 percent year-over-year between the first quarters of 2025 (5,934 Gigawatt hours, or GWh) and 2026 (6,872 GWh). However, coal generation dropped by 62% between over that same period, from 4,342 to 1,643 GWh.
Overall, Colorado’s total in-state generation actually dropped by 922 GWh in Q1 2026 compared with Q1 2025. Renewables’ share of utility-scale generation in Q1 2026 totals 51.5%, less than Mr. Best’s 53%, perhaps because the EIA may have revised its figures between last month’s edition and this one, or Best may be using an all-sectors basis rather than utility-scale.
Don’t pop the cork
Why did coal’s generation fall so precipitously? Xcel Energy’s Comanche Unit 3 has been offline since August 2025 for turbine repairs. If coal-fired generation held at its 2025 level (4,342 GWh) and total generation had increased with renewables on top, the Q1 2026 share would be 42.9%, not 51.5%. That’s a marginal percentage-point improvement from the same time the previous year and is entirely on par with the full-year 2025 generation percentage. That’s the result of Colorado’s largest single-year first quarter renewable addition on record, by the way.
Moreover, the EIA’s figures are in-state generation, not consumption, so it doesn’t count electricity that the state must import over transmission lines, and it does count electricity the state is exporting (and thus not consuming) when there are wind gluts. Total in-state generation has hovered around 56,000 GWh over the past decade while Colorado has grown. The state must import more as dispatchable generation retires, and the percentage of renewables masks what actually powers Colorado homes.
Assuming Comanche Unit 3 returns to service in August 2026 as planned, and there aren’t any good alternatives if Xcel wants to maintain a semblance of reliability, then the EIA’s data will reflect a sudden “decline” in the share of renewables generation in Colorado.
It isn’t likely that journalists and bloggers will mark the occasion with the same amount of fanfare.
Sarah Montalbano is a policy analyst with Independence Institute’s Energy and Environmental Policy Center and a contributor at Always On Energy Research.

