
Hunt: Fort Collins’ municipal broadband scheme still falling short
From the start, nearly all projections presented in the Connexion business plan, on which voters based their approval of the project, have failed to materialize.
From the start, nearly all projections presented in the Connexion business plan, on which voters based their approval of the project, have failed to materialize.
“City Council and (Fort Collins City Manager) Darin Atteberry need to stop discussing Connexion in executive session, behind closed doors, and instead have honest and hard conversations with the citizens who are on the hook if their rosy projections fail to materialize.” — Sarah Hunt, Fort Collins
At a time when internet connection is critical for all of us, rather than making up for lost ground, Connexion fell short by another $1.6 million in their next quarterly report. Either people don’t want the service or Connexion can’t provide it, or both. Either way, this experiment is failing.” Fort Collins resident Sarah Hunt.
“We are making sure we adhere to the council’s direction that we work with our current providers. We are trying to expand the possibility that the number of current service providers we have today is different in six months, nine months, whenever and that we are doing everything we can as a city to enable those providers to come into the city and provide business.” Greeley IT director Scott Magerfleisch.
“Covid is going to affect everyone’s budget whether it’s a personal or municipal budget.” — Greeley Mayor John Gates.
“I’m leery to enter into anything that is going to require us to have more infrastructure liabilities when we already have many that are backlogged.–Greeley Councilwoman Kristin Zasada.
The future doesn’t look much brighter, he said, as the cost to implement the enterprises increases and technology changes more rapidly than government-run broadband can keep up.
“If we have a problem there, it’s a problem of marketing and perception, and not reality, I don’t think it’s a problem that can be solved by investing capital or bringing broadband in.” — Rod Esch, task force member.
“Fiber is not future proof. I’d maybe call it future resistant, but there is going to be a time where there is a breakthrough in transmission technology where something is bigger, better and faster. There is always a push for bigger, better and faster. — Troy Mellon.
“If you’re talking internet, it’s hard to say it’s going to be this price at this point. Having had to raise utility rates — seems like every year in Longmont with the government — it is like with any business, there are costs dealing with infrastructure that increase over time. So of course, rates are going to increase. There can’t be just a set price of $49.99 for internet. Eventually, that price will go up for charter members. And right now, if you didn’t get in on that charter rate, it’s almost $70. And that’s just internet.” — Gabe Santos, former Longmont City Councilman.
“I don’t get this push for a municipality to take on being an (Internet Service Provider). You’re telling me you have more knowledge in the marketplace than a company that’s been doing it for decades. And what business has government ever ran more efficiently than private enterprise?” — Kevin Ross, Eaton Mayor.
“We can create some real harms if we’re not careful about things like data security and privacy. What governments also have to have a dialogue with industry about is this concept of a social license to operate. It’s really important that we don’t get into a world where each party looks to just leverage their legal rights.” — Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser.
By Jon Caldara
There are only three jobs worth having in Colorado. The first is fortunately mine.
Any person who can make a living by indulging his passion is beyond blessed. I somehow have provided for my family by fighting for personal and economic freedom in Colorado. Running Independence Institute, Colorado’s machine to promote liberty principles over party, politicians and special interests, is a dream come true.
The next coolest job in Colorado is quarterback for the Denver Broncos, which, by the way, I would be totally awesome at.
The only other job I’d want here would be governor, the most influential and powerful gig for changing policy and shaping the state’s future.
And to be Jared Polis, a near billionaire to boot, would be a rip. I mean, if you can self-fund your elections, you’re not beholden to moneyed special interests owning you. He’s also term limited. He can do what he pleases without regard to it harming any reelection.
So why do I feel sorry for him?
Though he can’t run for governor again, he’s eyeing the U.S. Senate or even the presidency. So, still a politician. And the curse of every politician is the same as that of every middle-school girl. All you care about is what other people think of you.
For nearly seven years now, Jared has been held hostage to the growing socialist-loony fringe of his party. He wants to be the pro-business libertarian he claims to be, but everyone inside Colorado knows he governs anti-liberty progressive.
And now people around the country are learning his spin was just that. Even Reason magazine, who fell for the con years ago, calling him the “libertarian governor,” is retracting the title (a la Steve Harvey announcing the wrong winner of Miss America).
Coming out of another stranger-than-strange, more-left-than-left, liberty-hating, economy-strangling legislative session, our poor governor is faced with political no-win decisions. Should he sign even more economy-killing, liberty-squeezing bills, or veto them?
To his credit, he bravely just vetoed bills to limit governmental transparency and to create a social media nanny state, angering many. Will more vetoes come?
Senate Bill 5 will force non-union workers to pay union dues (which almost all goes into political campaigning) and will drive private businesses to leave for friendlier territory. We’ll join California, New York and Illinois, watching the moving trucks roll to low-tax, worker-protected states like Texas, Tennessee and Florida.
If he signs it, he strangles the state economy and finishes what’s left of being “pro-business.” And the unions will work against him in his next primary.
Handicapped people, the elderly, those without cars and every one of us who have had a few too many rely on Uber and Lyft. If he signs the bill forcing them to outfit cars with recording systems and overly bureaucratic personnel requirements, they said they’d leave the state.
This would delight the taxi cartel and government transit, in other words, the left’s core team. So, it’s mobility, technology and free enterprise versus his beloved planner-state. He must choose.
I really feel sorry for Polis over House Bill 1312, one of the most anti-liberty, anti-child and anti-free speech acts of petulance we’ve ever seen. Veto this bill that punishes “misgendering or deadnaming” and erodes parental rights, and he angers the most-vicious and retribution-crazed wing of his cancel-culture left.
No more Polis Process
The Polis Process has been to take bills that destroy liberty and economic prosperity and get the legislature to water them down before they get to his desk. For example, he’s never wanted to sign a so-called assault weapons bill. No “libertarian” could. So, he gets those civil-rights haters to morph their bills into other god-awful anti-gun bills.
Thus, we have tiptoed our way to a gun-hating Colorado: local control to ban guns, waiting periods, weakening concealed carry rights, increased age limits, more red flag laws and, this year, the nation’s most onerous permitting scheme.
But look, Mom — no assault weapons ban!
This year signaled the last time this “Polis Process” will really be effective. The legislature just doesn’t care what he thinks anymore. He’ll be gone soon. They no longer mind putting him in no-win positions.
Frankly, I’m glad. The Polis Process has resulted in a death by a thousand cuts for our freedoms and our economy while Jared tries to please all the middle school girls.
Sorry, Jared. Time to see what’s more important to you, Colorado or your socialist friends.
The Colorado Supreme Court has just allowed Boulder’s lawsuit against big oil to move forward. Does the lawsuit have any merit, does it stand a chance, and what does it mean for Colorado? PowerGab Hosts Jake Fogleman and Amy Cooke discuss this and more.
Show Notes:
https://www.cpr.org/2025/05/12/colorado-supreme-court-allows-boulder-climate-lawsuit-suncor-exxon/
https://completecolorado.com/2025/02/09/colorado-high-court-climate-lawfare-case/
Isn’t the purpose of research in colleges and universities to challenge the status quo, rather than be constrained by it? Robert Maranto, who holds the 21st Century Chair in Leadership at the Department of Education Reform at the University of Arkansas, argues that McCarthy-era politics are now taking precedence over honest academic inquiry.