
Colorado legislature’s over-spending problem explained
Legislators discovering first-hand the impossibility of having their cake and eating it too.
Legislators discovering first-hand the impossibility of having their cake and eating it too.
The jury was not allowed to hear testimony about previous convictions and issues Galindo had, nor did prosecutor Michael Bailey present rebutting testimony that may have countered accusations about Deb Suniga — the relative in question — who actually quit Galindo’s campaign alleging then that Galindo mistreated her campaign staff.
“I wanted to fit in,” the teenager said. “I was always the youngest working on the campaigns. I wanted to feel like I was hanging with the big guys. I wanted to be involved in that level of the campaign.”
If convicted under Colorado law, Galindo faces between 6-18 months in jail and between $500 and $5000 in fines, or both.
“This political maneuver deprived the volunteers of this initiative of the COVID19 protections afforded by EO 065. The intent was to politically discriminate against this initiative since Polis does not support it thereby placing the petition circulators in danger of contracting COVID-19 and putting their lives at risk. This is a wanton disregard by Polis for the physical safety and well-being of the Colorado citizens.” Donna Windholz
If convicted under Colorado law, Galindo faces between 6-18 months and between $500 and $5000 in fines, or both.
The spending conflicts with one of the main platforms Weiser ran his campaign on —eliminating the ability of nonprofits to donate without disclosing its donors. In fact, Weiser took it one step further, making promises to denounce anyone spending money on his campaign that was not transparent.
In order for Galindo to “reimburse” herself, first, she had to have reported a loan or in-kind donation of some sort for the same amount, and she also was required to report who was actually paid the money and when. And all the amounts needed to match up.
Galindo reimbursed herself $4,500 for what she labeled as legal fees for a recall effort that was in place when she resigned on Mother’s Day. It is not the first time Galindo’s use of campaign funds has come into question.
“Conceptionally, this pulled the rug out from under not only California but the other 10 states that have adopted ZEV and 13 states that have adopted the LEV standards.”–Tim Jackson, Colorado Automobile Dealers Association.
The lawsuit has been tied up in court arguing procedural issues since 2011. Under former Attorneys General Cynthia Coffman and John Suthers, TABOR was heavily defended.
“This was an extreme measure,” Pallozzi said. “They are not letting democracy work. There is a lot of money on the Polis side trying to get in the way . The sad thing is they call me these words when they have no idea what kind of person I am.”
By Jon Caldara
Colorado’s Secretary of State Jena Griswold is responsible for running the state’s TRACER system. This is the public database where campaigns must file their contribution and expenditure disclosures. If you wanna see who’s funding a candidate, that’s where you go.
But if you went there last week, you would have seen it was “down for maintenance.”
That was a lie. There was no “maintenance.”
Griswold took it down to have the home addresses of elected officials redacted from the site. In the wake of the shootings of state legislators in Minnesota, many of Colorado’s elected officials asked her to do it.
So why not just tell us that? We would have more than understood the truth.
This database is required by law. Scrubbing it might or might not be a good policy. She might or might not have the authority to do it. But to fib and say it was “down for maintenance” just adds to the reasons trust in government is at an all-time low. They can’t even tell us the truth on this reasonable feat.
In fact, we might not have known any of this falsehood had it not been for a scoop by Axios Denver’s John Frank. Only when confronted did the Jena’s office cop to shutting it down to redact information. Yes, a tiny lie. But that’s the gateway drug to big lies.
A couple of years back, the Colorado Department of Transportation didn’t want folks driving on a high mountain pass during a snowstorm, so they lied and said it was closed. A fabrication, it was open and fine.
There is a pretension and arrogance with those it’s-for-your-own-good lies. And it conditions citizens to let government play parent to them.
It takes a certain amount of arrogance to use the machinery of government to promote inaccuracies and lies (insert Trump joke here). Government should be the record holder and storehouse of truth.
The secretary of state, county clerks, law enforcement, auditors and researchers must be wholly committed to recording only the full truth, no matter what.
Where does my property line end and yours begin? Who owns that car? When was someone born? When did he die? We must trust government records or pretty much everything — everything — falls apart.
But now records can be redacted and altered.
Changing one’s gender on a Colorado birth certificate is as easy as changing your mailing address. Was a person born a boy on a certain date? Who knows? Those records can now be legally falsified.
If changing birth certificates is legal, I need to change the birth date on mine. I identify as 67 despite the government record saying I’m 60. I want my Social Security checks now.
We’re told redacting TRACER records was a matter of safety for those in politics. But lots of us are in politics. Why only protect the elected?
These records still show the home addresses of everyone of us who donated to a campaign. Aren’t we worth the same level of safety and protection?
If an elected official is targeted for an act of violence, wouldn’t those who paid for him to get into office also be possible targets? Why does Griswold protect the privacy of her elected colleagues but not their supporters?
There’s a reason why people want to give their money anonymously — to save their lives and livelihoods.
During the bloody civil rights battles, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, NAACP, had to go to court to protect their donor’s privacy. Why? If doxed, those who financed their mission would have been lynched.
A few years back, there was a mass shooting at a Planned Parenthood office in Colorado Springs. Fortunately, Planned Parenthood also keeps their donors private. If that shooter could look up their funders’ addresses, they might have been targeted, too.
Every year the legislature tries to pass bills to end donor privacy, labeling such donations as “soft money.” “Soft money” is the pejorative term for “political speech I want to support, but don’t want to be killed over.”
How fun it will be to watch those very legislators who pressured Jena Griswold to redact their home addresses to turn around and demand others involved in politics be treated differently and stay easy targets.
Privacy and security for me. Exposure for thee.
A declining Colorado economy is beginning to have consequences against many of its own climate goals. What’s behind this and what tax credits are going away? PowerGab Hosts Jake Fogleman and Amy Cooke discuss this and more.
Show Notes:
https://coloradosun.com/2025/06/19/colorado-green-tax-credits-cut-economic-forecast/
https://coloradosun.com/2025/06/25/colorado-clean-energy-project-cancellations/
Raised in a Colorado Jewish family, Dave Kopel made Boulder his home decades ago. He’s noticed the town and the state is growing more hostile to Jews.