
Constitutional trouble ahead for Colorado’s National Popular Vote scheme
NPV is almost certainly unconstitutional—if not under the U.S. Constitution, then under the Colorado Constitution.

NPV is almost certainly unconstitutional—if not under the U.S. Constitution, then under the Colorado Constitution.

National popular vote was a crackpot idea that became favored by the left only after Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016.

Since 1787 there have been over 700 attempts to “abolish” the Electoral College. All have failed when confronted with Article V of the U.S. Constitution, which provides that “no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.”

We were one of the largest bipartisan movements in Colorado history to put a question on the ballot. I would absolutely do it again. I’m proud of giving people the opportunity to vote on something so important and personal, as people’s votes being taking away. — Mesa County Commissioner Rose Pugliese

A no vote on Proposition 113 on the November ballot repeals the statute, keeping Colorado out of the compact.

Rural Coloradans increasingly feel ignored by our urban-centric state legislature. Voting NO on Proposition 113 is a way we can make our voice heard.

Under the NPV Compact, Californians would inordinately dictate the outcome of presidential elections, which is just fine with Democrats.

In its new editorial the Daily Camera says, “That leaves us with recommending a system that’s in the best interests of the country as a whole. And the best way to do that would be to pass a national constitutional amendment mandating that the popular vote winner be elected president.”

If you are concerned about the voting disparities of the electoral college, then advocate reforms that would actually fix the underlying problems.

“Colorado’s slate of presidential electors must always be chosen ‘by direct vote of the people,’” says Kopel.

It’s hard to imagine any region of the country that would be hurt as badly by implementation of the national popular vote compact as Southern Colorado.

DENVER–The U.S Supreme Court on Monday ruled that states can bind their state presidential electors to vote for the state popular vote winner. Ruling in Chiafalo et al v. Washington
By Jon Caldara
If you’re a fan of limited government, personal liberty, or educational choice, Tuesday night’s election results were a downer, just another one in a long line of depressing elections that has made Colorado more California than California.
However, if you prefer a controlling elite deciding your fate, debt, class envy and teacher unions, it was just another victory in a decade’s long win streak.
I’m curious how multi-billionaire nannyist Michael Bloomberg felt about his out-of-state investment. He put $5 million toward convincing Denver voters adults must stop buying Swisher Sweets cigars (which contains flavored tobacco, the new fentanyl).
As adults drive by marijuana shops selling flavored edibles, liquor stores selling peach-infused vodka, and legal psychedelic mushroom operations, it’s adults buying smoking cessation products like Zyn in Denver that Michael Bloomberg knows is the scourge of our nation.
It didn’t matter it is already illegal for anyone under 21 years old to buy any tobacco or nicotine products, flavored or not. Bloomberg’s millions convinced voters this was a ban on children buying the stuff. He won handedly as he spent nearly $52 per “yes” vote to make it happen.
Fifty-two bucks a person was enough to convince Denverites who scream “my body, my choice!” when it comes to abortion that government needs to stay out of your uterus but shove itself down your adult lungs. He can’t run New York anymore, so he regulates Denver.
His $5 million was the most spent on any ballot issue or candidate in Colorado this year. For perspective, the class-baiting tax increase on rich people to buy free lunches for just slightly less rich people’s kids raised only $800,000. And that was a statewide question not a tiny one like Denver’s cigar ban.
Passing Propositions LL and MM, the double-down on free lunches in Colorado, was certainly no shock. But it gives us some things to speculate.
It did not surprise me MM passed. What did surprise me was it passed by a larger majority than the original tax proposal, Prop FF, just a couple years ago.
By contrast voters seem to have learned their lesson on the wolf reintroduction fiasco. If put on the ballot today, “wolves” would certainly lose. I think witnessing the debacle of flinging apex predators throughout Colorado is what drove Denver voters to recently reject the slaughterhouse ban and a ban on selling furs. They realized that maybe in some areas, government doesn’t know what it’s doing.
In the same way, the farce that is the free lunch program should’ve caused more of us to reconsider the blatant socialism of stealing from those who have more than you.
It took no time for the current free lunch program to run into the red. I mean, go figure, you offer people free stuff, and they line up to take it. The program also failed to source food locally as promised in the original Prop FF. In other words, the state really FFed the whole socialistic experiment.
Yet even after witnessing this failure, a larger percentage of people voted for MM than the original FF. More of us want to penalize successful people to empower government elite to decide what their own kids should eat.
Could this be a leading indicator the socialist value structure of “take from thy neighbor” has taken root here? Props FF and this year’s LL and MM might be the gateway drug for the cocaine of “democratic socialism.” The first one is always free. “Yo, here’s a sandwich for your kid, you know, on the house.” Before you know it, we’re replacing our successful flat income tax rate with a punitive, progressive income tax.
New York’s socialist mayor-elect spelled it out in his victory speech. “We will prove that there is no problem too large for government to solve, and no concern too small for it to care about.”
Translation: Here in Colorado we will destroy our economy to save the Earth from climate change (while China builds a dirty coal plant every day), punish the productive, risk-taking class and chase them out of the state (see New York in California) as we micromanage every aspect of your life (like outlawing Swisher Sweet cigars, and feeding your children the meals of our choosing).
Is this the Colorado we’ll buy when some out-of-state billionaire sells it to us?

Will Colorado’s plan on how to reform the Public Utilities Commission fairly represent Coloradans? PowerGab Hosts Jake Fogleman and Amy Cooke discuss this and more.
Show Notes:
PUC Sunset Review: https://coprrr.colorado.gov/sites/coprrr/files/documents/2025SunsetPublicUtilitiesCommission.pdf
Comanche 3 shutdown: https://coloradosun.com/2025/10/29/colorado-comanche-3-power-plant-issues-troubles/
Coalition of Ratepayers case study: https://i2i.org/the-coalition-of-ratepayers-case-study/

Another Colorado election and another sweep for the left. Marianne Goodland from the Gazette Newspapers dissects the results.