
Ganahl: Why Colorado should reject ‘national popular vote’
National popular vote would indeed fundamentally change presidential candidacies and governance, but in a very negative way.

National popular vote would indeed fundamentally change presidential candidacies and governance, but in a very negative way.

The big city/state capital/university tripod cannot always provide a majority, but it usually can create a plurality.

The most realistic solution is one or more constitutional amendments devolving power back to individuals, families, localities, and states.

James Wilson of Pennsylvania (1742-98) was one of the most influential of the Constitution’s framers. Some scholars rank him as second only to James Madison. Wilson was a distinguished lawyer

A majority of voters in the U.S. live in just nine states, and Colorado is not one of them.

If a majority of Coloradans, including independents, vote “NO,” on NPV in November 2020, we’ll be withdrawn from the NPV Compact and Coloradans ─ not New Yorkers or Californians ─will determine which presidential candidate gets our state’s nine electoral votes.

According to the Secretary of State, a 5 percent random sampling of signatures projected the number of valid signatures turned in at 183, 673, well over the required number.

“This is a historic grassroots movement.”–Mesa County Commissioner Rose Pugliese

The Left now uses this formula to control California, Illinois, New York, Oregon, and Washington—and Nevada is under threat as well.

“The compact should be called National Plurality Vote.”–Rob Natelson

Our forefathers intentionally designed a system that helped preserve the voices of smaller states, which Colorado has come to appreciate. Let’s not thumb our noses at their wisdom by joining the National Popular Vote compact and giving away our clout to the urban coastal states.

The suit was filed on behalf of Washington Free Beacon reporter Todd Shepherd. Shepherd also co-founded Complete Colorado before moving to Washington.
The issues on your ballot aren’t just questions about trains, taxes and spending. They are exhibits in a larger case: dishonesty, intimidation and political bullying have become standard operating procedure at the Colorado Capitol.
The message from lawmakers is increasingly simple: Vote however you like — we’ll make sure it turns out the way we like.
When voters might say no, they rewrite the question. When elected officials won’t cooperate, they replace them. When citizens organize an initiative, they sabotage it. And when the law becomes inconvenient, they exempt themselves from it.
Consider the legislature’s devotion to “democracy.”
Lawmakers exempted themselves from Colorado’s open-meetings law. Why? Because transparency is vital — right up until we want to see what they’re doing.
They warn President Donald Trump threatens democracy, then strip authority from democratically elected officials. They removed two-thirds of the elected Regional Transportation District board so their own appointees could take over.
Nothing protects democracy quite like replacing the people voters chose.
Then there was Initiative 175, citizens petitioning to vote on road funding. So, lawmakers passed a bill to neutralize the initiative before ballots were even cast. Its supporters finally had to pull their now impotent citizens’ initiative.
The legislature didn’t defeat the measure. It kneecapped voters’ ability to even vote on it.
That same attitude is stamped all over this year’s ballot.
Take Issue 7A, the latest choo-choo tax.
Never mind taxpayers are still waiting, and paying, for rail promised in 1971. Never mind we’re still waiting, and paying, for the train to Longmont promised in 2004. Never mind public money is being used to promote the cuckoo CoCo choo-choo tax.
The truly impressive part is the “rail” voting district. Areas considered friendly to the tax — such as Boulder and Denver — were gerrymandered into the district. Less enthusiastic communities gerrymandered out.
Apparently, when you can’t win the vote, you choose the voters. Call it “curated democracy.”
Then there’s Proposition NN, which asks us to surrender our Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR) tax refunds, naturally, “for education.” But after 10 years, the earmarks disappear and the money goes, well, we don’t know.
Unlike previous tax-refund grabs, Prop NN tinkers with the TABOR spending formula. This is a first in anti-taxpayer arrogance.
If excess revenue ever threatens to produce refunds again, NN gives lawmakers the power to change the spending formula, so those refunds disappear.
Your refund isn’t being stolen. It is being legislatively relocated.
The graduated income-tax proposal offers another clever trick: Its brackets aren’t indexed for inflation. As wages rise with inflation, taxpayers drift into higher brackets even when their real purchasing power hasn’t increased.
Their plan? Over time we will all be paying the top 8.4% income tax rate.
Why the relentless attack on TABOR? Because TABOR is inconvenient for people accustomed to taking.
Legislative leaders blame TABOR and Trump for Colorado’s budget squeeze. Yet their own analysts have identified the real problem: Legislators themselves treated temporary federal COVID money like permanent income and built continuing obligations around it (like Medicaid expansion to illegals).
Other states used one-time money for one-time expenses. Colorado behaved like someone who won a scratch ticket, leased a yacht and then blamed the bank when the bills arrived.
As voter-hating Sen. Jeff Bridges runs around leading literal cheerleading sessions against TABOR (really, check out the videos), he refuses to let people know his own Joint Budget Committee’s staff reported the budget problem was the legislature’s doing.
In January, legislative staff told them if temporary revenue had been spent on temporary needs, the state budget should have returned to balance.
That earned lawmakers what one news report called “a slice of humble pie.”
But why man up and take the blame when you can blame your spending orgy on TABOR.
So when you examine this year’s ballot, look beyond the soothing language about education, transportation and fairness. Look at the fine print and what lawmakers have worked so hard not to tell you.
These measures reflect a Capitol culture that treats voters less like citizens to be persuaded and more like obstacles to be outmaneuvered.
Our democracy is being worked over in broad daylight by the people claiming to protect it.
Nice vote you’ve got there, Colorado.
Be a shame if something happened to it.

Colorado is about to get a new governor. How will that change the state’s policies it has with power? PowerGab Host Amy Cooke discusses this topic with Dave Thielan from Liberal and Loving It.
Show Notes:
Dave Thielen on AI, data centers, Suncor, and politics
Suncor Case: https://deepbackground30.substack.com/cp/215552037
AI and Data Centers:
https://liberalandlovingit.substack.com/p/ai-ending-the-human-race-is-likely
https://liberalandlovingit.substack.com/p/datacenters-are-the-battle-ai-is

Journalist T.R. Reid joins us for a heated debate over Colorado’s proposed income tax changes, bracket creep, millionaire flight, and the future of TABOR refunds. Who really benefits, and who ends up paying more?