
Larison: The case against Boulder County Issues 1A and 1B
There is already a disproportionate amount of money going toward open space in the Boulder County budget.

There is already a disproportionate amount of money going toward open space in the Boulder County budget.

Trustees say these ordinances will help prevent gun violence; however, no evidence was offered that Lyons has experienced a level of gun violence that would make residents fear for their safety inside the foothills town.

If everyone were as law-abiding as concealed-carry licensees, crime would be so rare that hardly anyone would need a defensive firearm.

Boulder County’s ordinance will be the most severe to date of all communities.

“Let’s not forget that Xcel Energy is a publicly traded company. They made $1.6 billion in net income last year. They can offer these incentives out of their back pocket without having the entire community adopt these codes.” Neil Shah, Superior Town Trustee.

I have seen a lot of fires in Colorado and in Boulder County over the years, but I have never seen anything like what we just experienced.

If you look close enough, these policies are nothing but garbage.

According to the plaintiffs in the suit, Boulder County purchased the property under false pretenses.

In their complaint the adjacent landowners say Boulder County is betraying the trust of residents by pursuing an industrialized facility that is incompatible with the conservation easement county taxpayers purchased.

Under state law, if Cooper can gather the 13,926 signatures needed to put the measure on the 2020 ballot, voters will have two choices if they decide to increase the number to five. The first choice would be to draw five separate districts that would each elect its own commissioner. Districts would be similar in population numbers.

ERIE — In the northern Colorado community of Erie, County Line Road divides two worlds. The stark differences between the more liberal Boulder County on the west side of County
“I’ve been asked by a state Democratic (sic) party candidate if there is a progressive group of counties. I told her that such a group is in formation, but didn’t say more.” Nancy Jackson, Arapahoe County Commissioner
By Jon Caldara
If you’re a fan of limited government, personal liberty, or educational choice, Tuesday night’s election results were a downer, just another one in a long line of depressing elections that has made Colorado more California than California.
However, if you prefer a controlling elite deciding your fate, debt, class envy and teacher unions, it was just another victory in a decade’s long win streak.
I’m curious how multi-billionaire nannyist Michael Bloomberg felt about his out-of-state investment. He put $5 million toward convincing Denver voters adults must stop buying Swisher Sweets cigars (which contains flavored tobacco, the new fentanyl).
As adults drive by marijuana shops selling flavored edibles, liquor stores selling peach-infused vodka, and legal psychedelic mushroom operations, it’s adults buying smoking cessation products like Zyn in Denver that Michael Bloomberg knows is the scourge of our nation.
It didn’t matter it is already illegal for anyone under 21 years old to buy any tobacco or nicotine products, flavored or not. Bloomberg’s millions convinced voters this was a ban on children buying the stuff. He won handedly as he spent nearly $52 per “yes” vote to make it happen.
Fifty-two bucks a person was enough to convince Denverites who scream “my body, my choice!” when it comes to abortion that government needs to stay out of your uterus but shove itself down your adult lungs. He can’t run New York anymore, so he regulates Denver.
His $5 million was the most spent on any ballot issue or candidate in Colorado this year. For perspective, the class-baiting tax increase on rich people to buy free lunches for just slightly less rich people’s kids raised only $800,000. And that was a statewide question not a tiny one like Denver’s cigar ban.
Passing Propositions LL and MM, the double-down on free lunches in Colorado, was certainly no shock. But it gives us some things to speculate.
It did not surprise me MM passed. What did surprise me was it passed by a larger majority than the original tax proposal, Prop FF, just a couple years ago.
By contrast voters seem to have learned their lesson on the wolf reintroduction fiasco. If put on the ballot today, “wolves” would certainly lose. I think witnessing the debacle of flinging apex predators throughout Colorado is what drove Denver voters to recently reject the slaughterhouse ban and a ban on selling furs. They realized that maybe in some areas, government doesn’t know what it’s doing.
In the same way, the farce that is the free lunch program should’ve caused more of us to reconsider the blatant socialism of stealing from those who have more than you.
It took no time for the current free lunch program to run into the red. I mean, go figure, you offer people free stuff, and they line up to take it. The program also failed to source food locally as promised in the original Prop FF. In other words, the state really FFed the whole socialistic experiment.
Yet even after witnessing this failure, a larger percentage of people voted for MM than the original FF. More of us want to penalize successful people to empower government elite to decide what their own kids should eat.
Could this be a leading indicator the socialist value structure of “take from thy neighbor” has taken root here? Props FF and this year’s LL and MM might be the gateway drug for the cocaine of “democratic socialism.” The first one is always free. “Yo, here’s a sandwich for your kid, you know, on the house.” Before you know it, we’re replacing our successful flat income tax rate with a punitive, progressive income tax.
New York’s socialist mayor-elect spelled it out in his victory speech. “We will prove that there is no problem too large for government to solve, and no concern too small for it to care about.”
Translation: Here in Colorado we will destroy our economy to save the Earth from climate change (while China builds a dirty coal plant every day), punish the productive, risk-taking class and chase them out of the state (see New York in California) as we micromanage every aspect of your life (like outlawing Swisher Sweet cigars, and feeding your children the meals of our choosing).
Is this the Colorado we’ll buy when some out-of-state billionaire sells it to us?

Energy Co-Ops may list a variety of places that they get their power from, but how does that work and what arrives to the customers? PowerGab Hosts Jake Fogleman and Amy Cooke discuss this and more.
Show Notes:
https://coloradosun.com/2025/11/20/colorado-coal-power-comanche-extension/
https://bigpivots.com/bryan-hannegan-the-bigger-leagues/
https://coloradosun.com/2025/11/17/united-power-electricity-suppliers-wind-solar-battery-energy/

After all the years warning us of the upcoming energy disaster that is Colorado’s energy policy, Amy Oliver Cooke tells us there might be a little bit of hope. Just a little bit of hope.