
Wadhams: GOP must not shut the door on unaffiliated voters
Conspiracy theories and constricting access to the nomination process are sure losers for Colorado Republicans in 2022.

Conspiracy theories and constricting access to the nomination process are sure losers for Colorado Republicans in 2022.

Colorado Republicans already find themselves in a deep hole with swing voters.

Why is the Open Primary so widely praised by the punditry class when after two election cycles it has produced increasingly radical Democrat majorities?.

“We want unaffiliated voters to say, ‘Yeah, we want balance in government. We need to vote Republican.’ So, it concerns me that we would do anything that leads to a message that says we don’t want their vote.” — Senate Minority Leader Chris Holbert.

Telling 1 million Republicans they can’t vote doesn’t make them want to give time and treasure.

Colorado needs a strong Republican Party; that’s why I am stepping up to lead.

With redistricting coming before the next election, Republicans have an opportunity over the next two years to set a clear agenda and articulate it to voters.

Without Trump in the White House, voters will be able to see this new Democratic Socialist Party up close and personal.

Big picture my friends: supporting Republicans, both elected and future candidates, is the ONLY way we will win the majority back for those values and wrestle our great Colorado back from the liberty-stealing clutches of the Democrats.

Colorado GOP Chairman announces he will not seek reappointment to the position at the GOP state committee selection in March

A lawsuit filed this month claims seven petition circulators gathering signatures to place U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn on the Republican primary ballot were not Colorado residents, making the signatures invalid.
“Mr. Lindsey did not attend the County District Assembly on March 19th. We know this because he did not sign the official registry at Assembly check-in, nor did he pick up his voter packet with his credentials, name tag and ballots.”
Another week, another column about Colorado’s ruling class treating democracy like a state trooper treats the speed limit. It’s for other people.
I swear, I want to write about literally anything else — aliens, sports, lab-grown meat, Bigfoot opening a vape shop in Pueblo.
But Colorado’s legislature has never been more abusive to the citizenry, or hypocritical.
To save time, I won’t rehash the endless “No Kings,” “Trump is destroying democracy,” “our sacred duty is protecting democracy, so be happy you have us” self-promotion constantly ejaculated by Colorado’s ruling class.
But, for the sake of argument, let’s pretend every word of it is true. Let’s assume President Donald Trump wakes every morning and convenes a joint special-forces meeting to steal democracy in Colorado.
If democracy is truly hanging by a thread, then surely Colorado’s Democrat majority is heroically defending it. I mean, they say that’s their job one, next to banning ketchup packets (Senate Bill 146, seriously).
Which leaves me confused.
Because from my tiny little “just-a-citizen” brain perspective, they seem to spend an awful lot of time removing voters’ power, hiding meetings, dodging taxpayer consent and nullifying ballot initiatives.
Maybe I’m missing the advanced theory of democracy taught only in elite government seminars and overpriced Aspen retreats.
Take Senate Bill 150. It strips away two-thirds of RTD’s publicly elected board seats and replaces them with appointees.
Silly me. I thought democracy involved electing people.
But apparently true democracy is when insiders choose insiders to protect the public from the dangerous unpredictability of… the public.
Then there’s House Bill 1326, which exempts the all-powerful Public Utilities Commission from open meetings laws.
Again, I’m sure there’s a sophisticated democracy-enhancing explanation for this.
Perhaps democracy works best when the public cannot actually watch government decisions being made. Sort of a “trust us you peasants” model of self-government.
House Bill 1418 puts a “fee” on games young people play online.
Now, if it walks like a tax, quacks like a tax and drains your wallet like a tax, a normal person might call it a tax. But by labeling it a “fee,” lawmakers can dodge asking voters for permission.
Which is convenient. Because asking permission from citizens can really slow down democracy.
Even more amazing, this fee appears large enough that under existing law it should require voter approval anyway. Yet lawmakers are still trying to skip the vote.
Apparently democracy is strongest when elections are treated as optional.
Then there’s Senate Bill 135, which takes your TABOR refunds. At least this one goes to the ballot. But the ballot language will say the money goes to education.
In reality, only a small fraction actually does.
Maybe I’m old fashioned, but using misleading ballot language to convince voters to surrender their money feels less like defending democracy and more like a used car salesman turning back the odometer on a lemon.
Now comes the cherry on top, House Bill 1430, filed in the final chaotic moments of the session. Its purpose is beautifully simple: invalidate a citizen initiative that might appear on the ballot this fall. Kill what voters might vote for before they vote on it.
I always believed democracy meant if voters approve something at the ballot box, government respects the outcome. Isn’t that what the anger against Trump and Tina Peters is all about?
Here’s the backstory: Colorado used to dedicate sales tax revenue from automobile parts and accessories to roads. Which honestly seems reasonable, given roads are where cars generally go (Man, if I could still get away with a drunk driving joke, this would be a perfect spot).
But the legislature ended that sensible funding stream. We don’t really do road funding anymore. I don’t need to convince you of that. Instead, we currently do incentives for front-end alignment shops.
Now there’s a potential citizen initiative that might restore that road-funding mechanism. Maybe it makes the ballot. Maybe voters approve it. Maybe they don’t.
That’s how democracy is supposed to work.
But HB-1430 essentially says, “That’s cute. Your vote still won’t matter.”
If voters approve returning the road funding, with 1430 lawmakers will reduce road funding by the exact same amount.
Thankfully, Colorado is governed by people who understand democracy far better than voters do.
Thank God Colorado’s one-party rulers are here to save democracy from the voters.
Jon Caldara is president of Independence Institute, a free market think tank in Denver.

Colorado Governor Jared Polis recently discussed the future of Colorado and its energy targets. However, there doesn’t seem to be a path forward without extra resources. Where would this additional funding come from? PowerGab Hosts Jake Fogleman and Amy Cooke discuss this and more.
Show Notes:
SB26-182 CSU keep Ray Nixon open until 2032
SB 102 – Data Center and large load
HB 26 1030 – Data center and Utility Modernization
Jared Polis on Politico Energy Podcast
Pew Research: Americans blame utilities for rising home energy bills
Because the grid could use a backup plan.
Yes, we’re giving away a Predator Generator.
No, this is not a drill.
Yes, it’s because reliability apparently isn’t fashionable anymore.
Starting with the first show of 2026, drop a funny, clever, or pithy comment in the show’s comment section.
That’s it. No forms. No fine print to initial. No ESG questionnaire.
At the end of the session, we’ll select our top 3–5 favorite comments.
Then you vote on the winner.
Democracy still works here. Mostly.
Winner announced on the last show in May 2026.
One comment.
One generator.
Because when the grid wobbles, satire won’t keep your lights on — but a Predator Generator will.

In this conversation, political scientist Lindsey Cormack discusses why America’s civic knowledge crisis may be deeper than most people realize. From students not understanding basic government concepts like federalism, primaries, or even the three branches of government, to broader concerns about self-governance, voter participation, and the growing disconnect between citizens and civic responsibility, the discussion explores what happens when people stop understanding how their own system works. The interview also dives into ranked choice voting, approval voting, local government involvement, the “American experiment,” and why raising informed, engaged citizens may no longer be something schools can handle alone.