Colordo Amendmetn B

Hullinghorst: No on Amendment B; the case against repealing Gallagher

Dickey Lee Hullinghorst September 10, 2020

In my opinion, repealing the Gallagher Amendment is an extreme measure, and the effects will harm Colorado immediately and in the long run.

LATEST VIDEOS

Ep. 203 - T.R. Reid - Devil's Advocate

Journalist T.R. Reid joins us for a heated debate over Colorado's proposed income tax changes, bracket creep, millionaire flight, and the future of TABOR refunds. Who really benefits, and who ends up paying more?

44:23

He Denies Bracket Creep Exists in Colorado's Amendment 87

YouTube Video UEwyN1JnNDNac3N0QXZNazFrZmZpRUJNWFV0cXNHLTJhSC44ODA1RDFFM0Q4OTY1MEJF

Colorado is about to get a new governor. How will that change the state's policies it has with power? PowerGab Host Amy Cooke discusses this topic with Dave Thielan from Liberal and Loving It.

Show Notes:
Dave Thielen on AI, data centers, Suncor, and politics
Suncor Case: https://deepbackground30.substack.com/cp/215552037
AI and Data Centers:
https://liberalandlovingit.substack.com/p/ai-ending-the-human-race-is-likely
https://liberalandlovingit.substack.com/p/datacenters-are-the-battle-ai-is

34:08

PowerGab Ep133 - Political Power Policies

YouTube Video UEwyN1JnNDNac3N0Q1RlbGdMaEU5Z0gwUjVuV0pMM1l6OC4wNjIzRDA1OTQ2M0UyODEw

What happens when a child shows signs of dyslexia but their reading scores are too high to qualify for additional support?

Some children with dyslexia develop strong vocabulary and other skills that can mask their reading difficulties, allowing them to score above the threshold for a READ plan. As a result, parents may be left wondering why their child is struggling despite seemingly acceptable test scores.

On this episode of Learning Curve, hosts Erin Brantley and Ross Izard talk with cofounders of CO Kid about Colorado's new dyslexia screening requirements under SB25-200 and why early identification matters.

They explain how expanded screening could help identify children who might otherwise slip through the cracks, giving parents valuable information about their child's reading development—even when their child doesn't qualify for a formal intervention plan.

Because every parent deserves to understand why their child is struggling.

🎧 Watch the full episode of Learning Curve for more on Colorado's dyslexia legislation, parental rights, and the fight to improve literacy outcomes.

🔗 Learn more about CO Kid: https://cokid.org

#LearningCurve #DyslexiaAwareness #ColoradoEducation #EarlyLiteracy #ParentalRights #ReadingIntervention #Education

25:06

Your Child Is Struggling… But Doesn't Qualify for Help

YouTube Video UEwyN1JnNDNac3N0RHhUdnpnT2c4Q0pPMXVnYWZMY2ktZi5CMEQ2Mjk5NTc3NDZFRUNB

SUPPORT OUR SPONSOR

LATEST PODCASTS

The issues on your ballot aren’t just questions about trains, taxes and spending. They are exhibits in a larger case: dishonesty, intimidation and political bullying have become standard operating procedure at the Colorado Capitol.

The message from lawmakers is increasingly simple: Vote however you like — we’ll make sure it turns out the way we like.

When voters might say no, they rewrite the question. When elected officials won’t cooperate, they replace them. When citizens organize an initiative, they sabotage it. And when the law becomes inconvenient, they exempt themselves from it.

The kings of Colorado

Consider the legislature’s devotion to “democracy.”

Lawmakers exempted themselves from Colorado’s open-meetings law. Why? Because transparency is vital — right up until we want to see what they’re doing.

They warn President Donald Trump threatens democracy, then strip authority from democratically elected officials. They removed two-thirds of the elected Regional Transportation District board so their own appointees could take over.

Nothing protects democracy quite like replacing the people voters chose.

Then there was Initiative 175, citizens petitioning to vote on road funding. So, lawmakers passed a bill to neutralize the initiative before ballots were even cast. Its supporters finally had to pull their now impotent citizens’ initiative.

The legislature didn’t defeat the measure. It kneecapped voters’ ability to even vote on it.

That same attitude is stamped all over this year’s ballot.

Take Issue 7A, the latest choo-choo tax.

Never mind taxpayers are still waiting, and paying, for rail promised in 1971. Never mind we’re still waiting, and paying, for the train to Longmont promised in 2004. Never mind public money is being used to promote the cuckoo CoCo choo-choo tax.

The truly impressive part is the “rail” voting district. Areas considered friendly to the tax — such as Boulder and Denver — were gerrymandered into the district. Less enthusiastic communities gerrymandered out.

Apparently, when you can’t win the vote, you choose the voters. Call it “curated democracy.”

Gunning for TABOR

Then there’s Proposition NN, which asks us to surrender our Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR) tax refunds, naturally, “for education.” But after 10 years, the earmarks disappear and the money goes, well, we don’t know.

Unlike previous tax-refund grabs, Prop NN tinkers with the TABOR spending formula. This is a first in anti-taxpayer arrogance.

If excess revenue ever threatens to produce refunds again, NN gives lawmakers the power to change the spending formula, so those refunds disappear.

Your refund isn’t being stolen. It is being legislatively relocated.

The graduated income-tax proposal offers another clever trick: Its brackets aren’t indexed for inflation. As wages rise with inflation, taxpayers drift into higher brackets even when their real purchasing power hasn’t increased.

Their plan? Over time we will all be paying the top 8.4% income tax rate.

Why the relentless attack on TABOR? Because TABOR is inconvenient for people accustomed to taking.

Legislative leaders blame TABOR and Trump for Colorado’s budget squeeze. Yet their own analysts have identified the real problem: Legislators themselves treated temporary federal COVID money like permanent income and built continuing obligations around it (like Medicaid expansion to illegals).

Other states used one-time money for one-time expenses. Colorado behaved like someone who won a scratch ticket, leased a yacht and then blamed the bank when the bills arrived.

As voter-hating Sen. Jeff Bridges runs around leading literal cheerleading sessions against TABOR (really, check out the videos), he refuses to let people know his own Joint Budget Committee’s staff reported the budget problem was the legislature’s doing.

In January, legislative staff told them if temporary revenue had been spent on temporary needs, the state budget should have returned to balance.

That earned lawmakers what one news report called “a slice of humble pie.”

But why man up and take the blame when you can blame your spending orgy on TABOR.

Read the fine print

So when you examine this year’s ballot, look beyond the soothing language about education, transportation and fairness. Look at the fine print and what lawmakers have worked so hard not to tell you.

These measures reflect a Capitol culture that treats voters less like citizens to be persuaded and more like obstacles to be outmaneuvered.

Our democracy is being worked over in broad daylight by the people claiming to protect it.

Nice vote you’ve got there, Colorado.

Be a shame if something happened to it.

The gangster-style government under Colorado’s gold dome

Search Results placeholder

ORIGINAL REPORTING • COMMENTARY • PODCASTS • VIDEO

Colordo Amendmetn B

Hullinghorst: No on Amendment B; the case against repealing Gallagher

LATEST VIDEOS

SUPPORT OUR SPONSOR

LATEST PODCASTS

The kings of Colorado

Gunning for TABOR

Read the fine print

FOLLOW US

SITE MAP

WANT TO STAY IN TOUCH?

Copyright © 2025 Complete Colorado.