
Democrat senate candidates unify against fossil fuels at ‘Planet in Peril’ debate in Colorado Springs
Nine of the 10 candidates took the position that “fracking” needs to be banned nationwide.

Nine of the 10 candidates took the position that “fracking” needs to be banned nationwide.

Protections in the Colorado and U.S. Constitutions against government takings of private property could lead to taxpayers owing oil and gas owners hundreds of billions of dollars if Prop 112 passes.
No matter what happens “state-by-state” and “county-by-county,” a national fracking ban is the real goal, according the Democratic presidential candidate.
Roughly 90 percent of land across Colorado would be walled off, with an even greater impact in the handful of counties where most of the state’s oil and gas production takes place.
If the anti-fracking ballot measures two years ago were “radical” and “extreme,” you’d better find some new adjectives to describe this year’s proposals.
Her comments about mine workers and energy production raise the question: Do environmental activists hold more sway than organized labor in today’s Democratic coalition?

An example of Polis aiding anti-fracking activists came during the historic September 2013 floods — Polis legitimized the “ban fracking” activists by demanding a congressional hearing into the “toxic spills.”

Was (task force member Sura merely an interested observer, or one of Colorado’s Pied Pipers of anti-fracking, citing his own work in Erie and elsewhere as a justification for the task force’s existence?

Fracking is the most highly anticipated topic of 2015, and it deserves serious consideration. But the EPA’s power grab is the most dangerous threat to our economy and our state sovereignty—and the one for which we should be preparing.

As the crowd loudly chanted “ban fracking now” for approximately 30 seconds, Lachelt, then Earthworks’ Oil and Gas Accountability Project director, asked the crowd, “Are you fired up?”

As the crowd loudly chanted “ban fracking now” for approximately 30 seconds, Lachelt, then Earthworks’ Oil and Gas Accountability Project director, asked the crowd, “Are you fired up?”

All subsequent meetings will be open to the public…
The issues on your ballot aren’t just questions about trains, taxes and spending. They are exhibits in a larger case: dishonesty, intimidation and political bullying have become standard operating procedure at the Colorado Capitol.
The message from lawmakers is increasingly simple: Vote however you like — we’ll make sure it turns out the way we like.
When voters might say no, they rewrite the question. When elected officials won’t cooperate, they replace them. When citizens organize an initiative, they sabotage it. And when the law becomes inconvenient, they exempt themselves from it.
Consider the legislature’s devotion to “democracy.”
Lawmakers exempted themselves from Colorado’s open-meetings law. Why? Because transparency is vital — right up until we want to see what they’re doing.
They warn President Donald Trump threatens democracy, then strip authority from democratically elected officials. They removed two-thirds of the elected Regional Transportation District board so their own appointees could take over.
Nothing protects democracy quite like replacing the people voters chose.
Then there was Initiative 175, citizens petitioning to vote on road funding. So, lawmakers passed a bill to neutralize the initiative before ballots were even cast. Its supporters finally had to pull their now impotent citizens’ initiative.
The legislature didn’t defeat the measure. It kneecapped voters’ ability to even vote on it.
That same attitude is stamped all over this year’s ballot.
Take Issue 7A, the latest choo-choo tax.
Never mind taxpayers are still waiting, and paying, for rail promised in 1971. Never mind we’re still waiting, and paying, for the train to Longmont promised in 2004. Never mind public money is being used to promote the cuckoo CoCo choo-choo tax.
The truly impressive part is the “rail” voting district. Areas considered friendly to the tax — such as Boulder and Denver — were gerrymandered into the district. Less enthusiastic communities gerrymandered out.
Apparently, when you can’t win the vote, you choose the voters. Call it “curated democracy.”
Then there’s Proposition NN, which asks us to surrender our Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR) tax refunds, naturally, “for education.” But after 10 years, the earmarks disappear and the money goes, well, we don’t know.
Unlike previous tax-refund grabs, Prop NN tinkers with the TABOR spending formula. This is a first in anti-taxpayer arrogance.
If excess revenue ever threatens to produce refunds again, NN gives lawmakers the power to change the spending formula, so those refunds disappear.
Your refund isn’t being stolen. It is being legislatively relocated.
The graduated income-tax proposal offers another clever trick: Its brackets aren’t indexed for inflation. As wages rise with inflation, taxpayers drift into higher brackets even when their real purchasing power hasn’t increased.
Their plan? Over time we will all be paying the top 8.4% income tax rate.
Why the relentless attack on TABOR? Because TABOR is inconvenient for people accustomed to taking.
Legislative leaders blame TABOR and Trump for Colorado’s budget squeeze. Yet their own analysts have identified the real problem: Legislators themselves treated temporary federal COVID money like permanent income and built continuing obligations around it (like Medicaid expansion to illegals).
Other states used one-time money for one-time expenses. Colorado behaved like someone who won a scratch ticket, leased a yacht and then blamed the bank when the bills arrived.
As voter-hating Sen. Jeff Bridges runs around leading literal cheerleading sessions against TABOR (really, check out the videos), he refuses to let people know his own Joint Budget Committee’s staff reported the budget problem was the legislature’s doing.
In January, legislative staff told them if temporary revenue had been spent on temporary needs, the state budget should have returned to balance.
That earned lawmakers what one news report called “a slice of humble pie.”
But why man up and take the blame when you can blame your spending orgy on TABOR.
So when you examine this year’s ballot, look beyond the soothing language about education, transportation and fairness. Look at the fine print and what lawmakers have worked so hard not to tell you.
These measures reflect a Capitol culture that treats voters less like citizens to be persuaded and more like obstacles to be outmaneuvered.
Our democracy is being worked over in broad daylight by the people claiming to protect it.
Nice vote you’ve got there, Colorado.
Be a shame if something happened to it.

Colorado is about to get a new governor. How will that change the state’s policies it has with power? PowerGab Host Amy Cooke discusses this topic with Dave Thielan from Liberal and Loving It.
Show Notes:
Dave Thielen on AI, data centers, Suncor, and politics
Suncor Case: https://deepbackground30.substack.com/cp/215552037
AI and Data Centers:
https://liberalandlovingit.substack.com/p/ai-ending-the-human-race-is-likely
https://liberalandlovingit.substack.com/p/datacenters-are-the-battle-ai-is

Journalist T.R. Reid joins us for a heated debate over Colorado’s proposed income tax changes, bracket creep, millionaire flight, and the future of TABOR refunds. Who really benefits, and who ends up paying more?