
Recall launched against Sen. Kevin Priola; freshly-minted Democrat called ‘unacceptable’ in new district
Recall proponents say they’ve been denied the ability to vote for their representation.
Recall proponents say they’ve been denied the ability to vote for their representation.
“We are making sure we adhere to the council’s direction that we work with our current providers. We are trying to expand the possibility that the number of current service providers we have today is different in six months, nine months, whenever and that we are doing everything we can as a city to enable those providers to come into the city and provide business.” Greeley IT director Scott Magerfleisch.
“If you ever cross into the orange zone, you better make sure you have a map on you to remind you exactly where you can and can’t be. This is more like the Twilight Zone. Dumb, just dumb.” Greeley resident Sandra Olander.
All the seats are contested with two candidates for mayor, two candidates in Ward I, three candidates in Ward IV and seven running for two open At-Large seats.
Greeley does not have its own electric utility; therefore, financing a project this size requires other options, including partnering with other broadband companies that are willing to invest in the risk of laying millions of dollars in infrastructure that would operate the network.
“Galindo was an elected official,” Peif said. “If any report was ever a matter of public interest, it was that one. No one should have been charged.”
Grand Opening for the Greeley office, located at 808 9th St., is from 10 a.m. – 2 p.m. May 11.
“I don’t want to wait. I’d like to see us take a position right now and draft an ordinance. It needs to address those constitutional issues and officer safety — Brett Payton, Greeley City Councilman.
“Obviously, it’s going to have an effect, with Greeley being one-third of Weld’s population. That is a significant part of the population that is directly related and can be effected by whatever happens in the oil and gas industry. So that has to be taken seriously.” — Greeley Mayor Pro Tem Robb Casseday.
“All we have are our voices. But that’s enough. If we are nothing more than a bunch of mayors locking arms on the courthouse steps, that’s fine. It carries a punch.” — Scott James, Johnstown Mayor on “Mayors Against Proposition 112”
“We are in a situation that we have revenue that leaves us without an excuse,” Senate President Kevin Grantham said. “We’re in a position that I haven’t seen since I’ve been here. We’re in a position that I haven’t seen since I’ve been paying attention. Having the money and then not doing it would not be a good way to finish this session.
“They get to celebrate Cinco de Mayo and Dia de los Muertos here. They get to experience these holidays with others outside our home that know what they are. And it’s made a good connection with my grandparents because as they’ve gotten older they speak more Spanish than they do English, and so it’s nice to see that.” — Salida del Sol parent Tara White.
By Jon Caldara
TABOR simply means voter consent. TABOR is democracy. Weakening TABOR is weakening democracy.
Every couple of years the spending lobby orchestrates an assault on our Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights. They are testing another onslaught likely for next year.
I was around for the fights to pass TABOR in the early 1990s. Then- Gov.Roy Romer famously declared if it passed, it will put a “going out of business” sign on the entrance to Colorado.
Oddly, our population has nearly doubled since then, and state spending has ballooned from just more than $6 billion to roughly $44 billion.
Read that headline again. Since TABOR, our population grew one-fold, state spending grew 7-fold. Predictable tax and spending policy helped create a boom.
The opposite of Romer’s scare is true. If we mess with our Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, then we might as well put a “going out of business” sign on the entrance to Colorado.
Like telling tales of the boogeyman around the campfire to frighten children, those who feed on unconstrained spending want to scare the kids, too. The young in this case are those who weren’t in Colorado before we demanded simple voter consent over our own money.
Get ready for a new batch of stories on how this Chupacabra of fiscal restraint is somehow making our lives worse, and the only way to slay the monster is to attack democracy and take away our right of consent.
Look no further than U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet’s announcement of gubernatorial aspiration. The first thing he said was he needs to be governor of Colorado to protect us from the current, unprecedented threat to democracy, being President Donald Trump. The second thing he said was we need to attack democracy to get rid of TABOR. I’m sorry, “reform” TABOR.
He will save our democratic right to vote by taking away our democratic right to vote.
He and the rest of the taking coalition find it nauseating to ask voters for consent to commandeer and spend even more of their livelihoods. They never mention with TABOR they can still grow the size of government as large as they like! All they have to do is — wait for it, because it is so very terrifying — ask us first.
They can raise the taxes to 100% of what we earn. All they must do is ask us first. Increase debt so much our great-great-great grandchildren will still be paying it off. Just ask our consent.
They refuse to accept that no means no. So, they need to find a way where they no longer must ask at all.
Our Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights is the very expression of direct democracy. We need to be absolutely clear on what this coming assault against our right to say no is. This is an attack on democracy itself.
They will cleverly find a way to use democracy to kill democracy. To find a way for us to vote against TABOR just once to take away our right to vote forevermore.
Throughout history that is how democracies step aside for tyranny. Tyrants from Hitler to Putin were legitimately voted into power, only to pervert democracy so they were never threatened by voter consent again.
When power is concentrated, democracy constricts.
The history of TABOR proves it as well. Seven black-shirts have weakened TABOR, not voters. The Colorado Supreme Court have ripped holes through this protection for direct democracy.
TABOR says we get to vote on taxes. The black-shirts ruled calling a “tax” by a different name, “fee,” means we lose our vote. Without a single public vote now nearly three-fourths of what the state spends is “fees.”
TABOR says we get to vote on debt. The black-shirts ruled calling “debt” by a different name, “Certificates of Participation (COPS),” means we don’t get to vote.
TABOR says government can ask us to keep excess tax revenue, but only for four years. The black-shirts ruled “four years” will be interpreted as “forever,” meaning if they can con voters out of their refunds only once, they never need ask again.
And that’s why every couple of years they put something on the statewide ballot to end TABOR refunds forever.
Like a child nagging for a treat, they want to wear us down.
But unlike a child, if we give into this tantrum once, they get all the candy they want, forever.
A new legislative bill in Colorado aims to incentivize data centers with money from the taxpayers. PowerGab Hosts Jake Fogleman and Amy Cooke discuss this bill, its progress, and what it would mean for Coloradans.
Show Notes:
https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025A/bills/2025a_280_01.pdf
By law, children must go to school, and if parents can’t afford a private school or to home school, children must go to government run schools. That makes our children’s safety at the school the government’s top priority. Our children are in their custody after all. Lindsay Datko of JeffCo Kids First has discovered our kids are anything but safe.