
Carroll: Urban elites must let go of mass transit fantasies
If RTD truly is key to solving so many serious problems, then we must be doomed.
If RTD truly is key to solving so many serious problems, then we must be doomed.
You can’t expect data on violent encounters with police to mirror the ethnic breakdown of the larger population so long as cops are being called more frequently into some neighborhoods than others.
The actual reality of gentrification is complex, but the positives clearly seem to outweigh the negatives.
The Colorado Supreme Court is supposed to act as a stout defender of civil liberties. But apparently all bets are off when it comes to private property. In that sphere
Facilitating transit ridership is a good thing, and RTD and local municipalities need to do more of it. But the task should be pursued with an appreciation that cars are here to stay as the mainstay of mobility.
Rival Democrats like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren who regularly portray corporate America as the enemy of the people may actually believe it — Sanders certainly does — but Hickenlooper could never credibly make such a claim.
It would usher in the sort of squalid, quasi-permanent encampments on public property that have become a problem for cities such as Los Angeles, Portland and Seattle.
The tactic is also tone deaf in a city in which recent growth, particularly in higher density central neighborhoods, has resulted in a whitening of the overall population.
The list of donors reads like a who’s who of Colorado’s tax and spend political class.
By Jon Caldara
Colorado’s Secretary of State Jena Griswold is responsible for running the state’s TRACER system. This is the public database where campaigns must file their contribution and expenditure disclosures. If you wanna see who’s funding a candidate, that’s where you go.
But if you went there last week, you would have seen it was “down for maintenance.”
That was a lie. There was no “maintenance.”
Griswold took it down to have the home addresses of elected officials redacted from the site. In the wake of the shootings of state legislators in Minnesota, many of Colorado’s elected officials asked her to do it.
So why not just tell us that? We would have more than understood the truth.
This database is required by law. Scrubbing it might or might not be a good policy. She might or might not have the authority to do it. But to fib and say it was “down for maintenance” just adds to the reasons trust in government is at an all-time low. They can’t even tell us the truth on this reasonable feat.
In fact, we might not have known any of this falsehood had it not been for a scoop by Axios Denver’s John Frank. Only when confronted did the Jena’s office cop to shutting it down to redact information. Yes, a tiny lie. But that’s the gateway drug to big lies.
A couple of years back, the Colorado Department of Transportation didn’t want folks driving on a high mountain pass during a snowstorm, so they lied and said it was closed. A fabrication, it was open and fine.
There is a pretension and arrogance with those it’s-for-your-own-good lies. And it conditions citizens to let government play parent to them.
It takes a certain amount of arrogance to use the machinery of government to promote inaccuracies and lies (insert Trump joke here). Government should be the record holder and storehouse of truth.
The secretary of state, county clerks, law enforcement, auditors and researchers must be wholly committed to recording only the full truth, no matter what.
Where does my property line end and yours begin? Who owns that car? When was someone born? When did he die? We must trust government records or pretty much everything — everything — falls apart.
But now records can be redacted and altered.
Changing one’s gender on a Colorado birth certificate is as easy as changing your mailing address. Was a person born a boy on a certain date? Who knows? Those records can now be legally falsified.
If changing birth certificates is legal, I need to change the birth date on mine. I identify as 67 despite the government record saying I’m 60. I want my Social Security checks now.
We’re told redacting TRACER records was a matter of safety for those in politics. But lots of us are in politics. Why only protect the elected?
These records still show the home addresses of everyone of us who donated to a campaign. Aren’t we worth the same level of safety and protection?
If an elected official is targeted for an act of violence, wouldn’t those who paid for him to get into office also be possible targets? Why does Griswold protect the privacy of her elected colleagues but not their supporters?
There’s a reason why people want to give their money anonymously — to save their lives and livelihoods.
During the bloody civil rights battles, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, NAACP, had to go to court to protect their donor’s privacy. Why? If doxed, those who financed their mission would have been lynched.
A few years back, there was a mass shooting at a Planned Parenthood office in Colorado Springs. Fortunately, Planned Parenthood also keeps their donors private. If that shooter could look up their funders’ addresses, they might have been targeted, too.
Every year the legislature tries to pass bills to end donor privacy, labeling such donations as “soft money.” “Soft money” is the pejorative term for “political speech I want to support, but don’t want to be killed over.”
How fun it will be to watch those very legislators who pressured Jena Griswold to redact their home addresses to turn around and demand others involved in politics be treated differently and stay easy targets.
Privacy and security for me. Exposure for thee.
Are green energy sources as economically friendly as they are being portrayed? Or are there other factors that make them not quite as green-friendly as marketed? PowerGab Hosts Jake Fogleman and Amy Cooke discuss this with Sarah Montalbano from the Center of the American Experiment.
Show Notes:
Raised in a Colorado Jewish family, Dave Kopel made Boulder his home decades ago. He’s noticed the town and the state is growing more hostile to Jews.